Elon Musk, Tesla board sued in lawsuit alleging “erratic” tweets violate fiduciary duty

Elon Musk, Tesla board sued in lawsuit alleging “erratic” tweets violate fiduciary duty

Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s tweets are the subject of another lawsuit. A Tesla investor is suing the company board and Musk for continuing to send ‘erratic tweets’ that violate a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that requires oversight of…

Read More…

How to Optimize Amazon PPC Advertising Campaigns 2020 (Hindi)

In this video, you are going to learn how to Optimize Amazon PPC Advertising Campaigns 2020.

Watch Next:
How to Create Amazon Sponsored Product Ads- https://youtu.be/rfk7ApvlL2w
How To Create Amazon Affiliate Account – https://youtu.be/jH91mSH98Hg
How To Get Fast Subscribers On Youtube Channel- https://youtu.be/9E68loH8luc
How to Add Tags to your YouTube Videos – https://youtu.be/_gVbvayY4hk
How to Create Facebook Ads- https://youtu.be/RIhtYccRdwc
How To Promote YouTube Videos With Google Ads Campaign- https://youtu.be/6PdjePZ0Nu0

Watch this video if you want to learn how to optimize your automatic Amazon PPC advertising campaigns, step by step. All Amazon sellers need to get into this habit every day. A lot of times we may be spending so much money on PPC but not actually converting. There are a lot of moving parts and components when it comes to Amazon PPC advertising campaigns. Make sure you understand your campaigns by selecting profitable keywords!

Aajao Instagram Par:
https://www.instagram.com/digital.gajendra

GEAR USED
○ My Mobile: https://amzn.to/32RsmTo
○ Microphone: https://amzn.to/2Z0elBM
○ Tripod: https://amzn.to/2EP6joB
○ Chair: https://amzn.to/3jJ8x7X
○ Laptop: https://amzn.to/353GnA6
○ LED Light: https://amzn.to/3gT2c83

And make sure you subscribe to my channel!
www.youtube.com/digitalgajendra?sub_confirmation=1

QUERIES SOLVED
○ Amazon PPC tutorial for beginners
○ How to run amazon PPC Ads step by step
○ How to optimize amazon PPC
○ How to Optimize Amazon PPC Advertising Campaigns 2020

Curated by Digital Gajendra
For More Such Videos Visit Our Channel.

DISCLAIMER
Links included in this description might be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you! Thank you for supporting me so I can continue to provide you with free content each week!
_________________________________________________________________________

#digitalgajendra #amazonppc #amazonppctutorial #amazonadvertising

Game Stopped? Who Wins and Loses When Short Sellers, Social Media, and Retail… (EventID=111355)

Connect with the House Financial Services Committee
Get the latest news: https://financialservices.house.gov/
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HouseFinancialCmte
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FSCDems
___________________________________

On Wednesday, March 17, 2021, from 10:00 a.m. (ET) full Committee Chairwoman Waters and Ranking Member McHenry will host a virtual hearing entitled, “Game Stopped? Who Wins and Loses When Short Sellers, Social Media, and Retail Investors Collide, Part II.”

– – – – – – – –
Witnesses for this one-panel hearing will be:

• Michael Blaugrund, Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange

• Vicki Bogan, Associate Professor, Cornell University

• Alexis Goldstein, Senior Policy Analyst, Americans for Financial Reform

• Dennis Kelleher, Co-Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Better Markets

Overview

In January 2021, retail investors on social media site Reddit’s “WallStreetBets” subchannel (“subreddit”) collectively executed an investment strategy to induce a short squeeze in stocks such as GameStop, AMC and KOSS, as well as other securities they identified as being heavily shorted by hedge funds. These social media users collectively drove the stock prices up, forcing short sellers, who bet the stock price would go down, to purchase shares at an increased price. On February 18, 2021, the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing to discuss the facts and circumstances around the short squeeze with those who were directly involved, including Keith Gill, WallStreetBets user; Kenneth C. Griffin, Chief Executive Officer, Citadel LLC; Steve Huffman, Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder, Reddit; Gabriel Plotkin, Chief Executive Officer, Melvin Capital Management LP; and Vladimir Tenev, Chief Executive Officer, Robinhood Markets, Inc. These events raised several critical questions about the conflicts of interest between payment for order flow and best execution, the sufficiency of short sale disclosures, whether settlement times should be accelerated, the market dominance of certain participants, and the impact of gamification on America’s capital markets. These issues are discussed in more detail below.

Payment for Order Flow and Best Execution

Instead of sending customer orders to national exchanges, Robinhood Financial LLC, as well as other retail broker-dealers, route customer orders to principal trading firms or electronic market makers that, in turn, either execute the orders or submit them to market centers. Principal trading firms profit from accepting these orders “either by taking the other side of the customer orders and exiting the positions at a profit … or by routing the orders to other market centers.” Broker-dealers also receive incentives from submitting their customers’ orders to a particular principal trading firm. One such incentive is called “payment for order flow” (PFOF).

Reporting from Alphacution, a research firm, indicates that aggregate PFOF revenue nearly “tripled at four major brokerages—TD Ameritrade, Robinhood, E*Trade, and Charles Schwab— to $2.5 billion in 2020 from $892 million in 2019.”4 Other broker-dealers, including Webull, Ally Invest, and Interactive Brokers reportedly received nearly $300 million in such payments. Some argue that PFOF helps to lower retail broker-dealer commissions and allows some retail brokerdealers, such as Robinhood, to offer “commission-free trading.” Others, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission), have noted that, in some cases, commission-free trading comes “with a catch,” including customers receiving inferior execution prices.

The SEC’s regulatory approach to PFOF has largely involved disclosure requirements aimed at addressing the potential conflicts of interest that PFOF may pose for broker-dealers. Critically, in addition to those disclosure requirements, retail broker-dealers are also required to get the “best execution” for their customers. This means that if a retail broker-dealer routes customer orders to a market maker, retail broker-dealers such as Robinhood have to make sure the market maker will execute the customer’s order on the most favorable terms and prices reasonably available in the market. The retail broker-dealer may not, for instance, route an order based solely on which market maker will offer the most incentives for order flow. Nonetheless, there is an inherent conflict between a retail broker-dealer’s receipt of PFOF, and its best execution obligations, because retail broker-dealers may be inclined to send a customer order to the principal trading firm that will pay the most, instead of to the one that will execute the customer’s order on the most favorable terms.

Form 13-F Reporting

Section 13(f) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 13(f) requires institutional investment managers….

Hearing page: https://financialservices.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=406268

SEO Agency Philadelphia
¤